Judging books

Early in life, I learned to care too much what other people think.  I think this was one of Dad’s faults, passed on to me.  I’m generally private about my business, and I’m usually hyper-aware of talking so loudly that the neighbors might hear.  Will someone notice me in jeans on Sunday and think I’m not going “to church”?  Will someone notice me in a sport coat and think I’m some haughty Christian who thinks he’s better than everyone else while going “to church”?

My mom, on the other hand, cares far less about others’ perceptions, and this ends up being one of her faults.  I suppose I got some of this one, too.  Sometimes I’m just going to do the thing I have in mind or heart, no matter what someone might think.  This trait, I think, can manifest strength of character.  It can also betray stupidity.

It’s with these inherited traits in mind that I mention (and discuss a little) a few book titles that I’m embarrassed about.  In other words, I’m afraid these books—and I—will be judged by their covers.  I’ve never gone out in public with some of them . . . or I hide them . . . or I at least think twice.  For the embarrassment, the caring-too-much-what-people-think, I owe Dad.  For the willingness to make it public in this blogpost, not caring too much what naysayers might think, I owe Mom!  (Writing was/is a strength for both of them.)

These titles will come in two supra-categories:  the negative (those I judge to be not for public view) and the positive.

Not for public view

The Politics of Jesus (John Howard Yoder)
I’ve had this book for a couple years but have barely cracked its cover.  It’s written by a now-deceased Anabaptist theologian whose mind has been highly influential but whose character and actions have been seriously (legally) judged.  I’m pretty sure this book is going to challenge me with a deeper view of “politics,” dealing with Jesus’ views and ways and means in the areas of social intercourse and ethics.  That is a much higher road than the pathway that leads to the polarizing party system and the mixing of authentic Christianity with today’s political “right.”

I’m afraid that when people see this cover, they’ll think I actually align myself with the religious right.  Not at all.  I’m interested in pretty much anything that deals soberly with Jesus, but I have no time for those who think Jesus wants to change the government of a contemporary country—or that He was at all concerned with affecting the Roman empire in any political sense.  My Jesus isn’t in the business of geopolitics or national politics, although He cares about all the business of people’s lives.

Standing with Israel (David Brog)
A real academic is not embarrassed about having books on his shelves that take contrary views.  He, in fact, has been intellectually stimulated in dealing with such opposing views, and has incorporated some of their aspects into his own thinking.  I, however, am not this kind of academic.  Not all the time, anyway.  Also, it is not other academic-types who’re likely to see my shelves . . . so I even hide the spine of this book in my own home.  The friends who might see it in my living room would not understand why it’s there, or wouldn’t know to ask, or would likely assume something about my thinking that I’d be horrified about.  I wouldn’t take Standing With Israel out in public.

I have one book in this camp that’s even worse.  I note that it was published by a Time Warner imprint (not a religious publisher such as Zondervan or Eerdmans), and the TW entertainment conglomerate might have been onto something.  I consider this title merely entertainment:  The American Prophecies:  Ancient Scriptures Reveal Our Nation’s Future.  One doesn’t have to go beyond the cover to realize this is balderdash.  Baseless fiction.  Nation Under God is another one I wouldn’t want public, although its content could head in multiple directions.  The Great Church-State Fraud is provocative, and I might carry that one around eventually. 

I’m proud now to own Three Views of Israel and the Church, a thoughtful debate book that presents representatives of three distinct views and includes scholarly challenge to each view.  I’d be cautious about this one—again, because of presumptions about the religious right—but I plan soon to post notes based on gleanings from this book.

Holy Bible (NRSV)
I wish the covers of some Bibles were different.  Believe it or not, I’m actually embarrassed at the words “Holy Bible.”  For the nonbeliever or disinterested party, I fear the “holy” part sounds presumptuous.  And for all of us, I feel a kind of mesmerizing effect that puts us to thoughtless sleep instead of thoughtful introspection.  In other words, we can be lulled by having a “Holy Bible” in our hands rather than pondering and dealing responsibly with the varied contents of this library we call “Bible.”

Yes, I’d let these be seen by almost anyone

On the other hand, some book titles I’ve been proud to carry around, hoping someone might ask me about them:

  • This Beautiful Mess (Rick McKinley)
  • Mere Discipleship (Lee Camp)
  • The King Jesus Gospel (Scot McKnight)
  • The Kingdom of God in the Teachings of Jesus (Norman Perrin)
  • Salvation by Allegiance Alone (Matthew Bates)

Will someone be interested, judging these titles worthy of note?  Will we be able to dialogue about the nature of God’s kingdom—and humans as loyal subjects and disciples?  Will they ponder the words and work of Jesus just a little more?  Do I care too much about what people think?  I’m not a very good ambassador in most ways.  Far too often, I don’t represent my Lord very well, and maybe, just maybe, someone could see my intent in a book, overlooking my personal failings.

What if I carried around a little book titled The Gospel of Christian Atheism without hiding its cover?  Would that start some discussions, or what?  I can hardly wait to get into that one.  According to a cover blurb, this is no atheist author.  Rather, he seeks to promote primitive Christianity; “gospel” and “atheism” are used advisedly, provocatively, in order to attract readers who might not otherwise pick up a “Christian” book.  But what is “Christian”?  I suspect that this author will use a working definition closer to my own than to, say, most journalists’ or evangelicals’ definitions.

For those who aren’t interested in topics of scripture or Christianity:  I’m never ashamed of Grisham novel titles; I recently finished Camino Island and have read a dozen others.  Most of my baseball books are displayed proudly.  Poetry?  Short stories?  Sure.  And I’d be proud to carry The Shallows:  What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains (Nicholas Carr).  And yes, I just searched the WWW to make sure I have its author’s name correct!

9 thoughts on “Judging books

  1. navcad56 01/04/2020 / 11:05 am

    Thanks, Brian.

    Just ordered Brogs’ book, as a challenge to my own views on the issue!

    I have similar thoughts about volumes on my shelf such as Mao’s selected thoughts and his little red book which I have had for ddecades, not to mention The Stalag Edition of Mein Kampf

    Like

    • Brian Casey 01/04/2020 / 11:23 am

      The acquisition of that book might well be the least useful thing you’ve ever done in your entire, very useful life, Bob. 🙂 I would have recommended the Three Views book to you, although I wouldn’t be sure that you need your views challenged as much as I sense I need my own challenged.

      Like

    • navcad56 01/04/2020 / 11:28 am

      Ordered it, as well, though I have sneaking suspicion it is already buried in my library, captive 70 miles away in torage!

      Sigh

      Liked by 1 person

    • Brian Casey 01/04/2020 / 11:29 am

      I know you have few beds of ease on which to lay your weary head, like me.

      Like

    • navcad56 01/04/2020 / 12:01 pm

      THank the Lord, I am surrounded by a host of friends far more tempered in The Faith than myself, though their observations are buried in my stiorage unit!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. godschildrenorg 01/07/2020 / 11:32 am

    I care a little too much what others think, but I hold to the opinion that if someone is so unlearned that they judge you by the books you carry, or what you wear…they are not a friend. A true friend will share with you in a caring, concerned manner their concern. They will ask what that led you to read the book. Or, as my Nana did in 1950…she told me in a nice, concerned way, (and as an authority on what is appropriate to wear to CHURCH), “Mary Anne, tell Danny not to wear argyle socks when he is preaching.” HA, Ha, ha!

    I applaud your choice for light reading. I have enough “heavy” in my life. I stick to lighter reading when time allows. I’ve read all of Sherlock Holmes, Poirot, Agatha Christi, Jan Karon, much of Grisham, every one of Viktor Frankl I could find, C. S. Lewis, also historic novels, . I’ve read a “ton of books” related to my work as a Licensed Clinical Social Worker. If you’re interested, I can quickly figure out a person’s psychiatric disorder, or say if they are not insane. he, he!

    But my favorite book has always been the Word of God. As I age, I need His comfort and encouragement more and more. Two prayers that help me stay focused on what He wants me to do — “Use me as a tool in your hands to glorify you.” “Bring to me those who have a heart for you so that when they learn they will obey and be saved for eternity.” I’m a volunteer Kingdom seed sower. God will give the increase in His own timing. (Feel free to kid me about some capital letters, but that is just one way I choose to give honor to Him.). Keep sharing!
    ~~ Anne (in Athens helping Dino Roussos reach out to refugees who seek to learn about the Lord.)

    Like

    • Brian Casey 01/07/2020 / 11:43 am

      Funny about the argyle socks. I knew another preacher who always were crazy socks intentionally, so he could be more cool in the eyes of the young.

      Ideally, of course, you’re right that a true friend would have a true conversation instead of judging me by the book covers I carry. Still, I’m a little paranoid, and for some good reasons. Now try out your diagnosis on that!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. godschildrenorg 01/07/2020 / 11:38 am

    I forgot to say, the well worn but true phrase — “you may be the only Bible some people read.” In other words, be aware that there are people who look to us as a life example. There are some whom you will never realise until eternity that you had any positive influence on them. I am confident that you will be on the right hand side with some who are there because of your love for God and for Truth.
    ~~ aa

    Like

    • Brian Casey 01/07/2020 / 11:41 am

      Right on. I was just working on a post that deals with the judging of fruit in lives (reading our very personal books, in other words), including my own life.

      Liked by 1 person

Please share your thoughts. I read every comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.