Again with the reforming

A man named Kevin Vanhoozer is apparently leading an effort to mark the 500th anniversary of Luther’s 95 theses with a new “confession of faith.”  Click here to read about the “Reforming Catholic Confession”—a document that is by definition not Roman but that uses “catholic” in its purer sense.

Now, for three decades I’ve believed (and periodically asserted) that reforming and restoring should be conceived of as ongoing, perpetual processes.  Never should one think he has arrived at a state of having been restored.  Nor do I think it becoming or wise for a group, no matter how broad and inclusive it thinks it is, to call itself “Reformed.”  Even if one were to include all the denominations that call Reformed theology their doctrinal home, you would still only have a slice of the Christian pie.  There are many others, and a great many of us have hearts and brains, too.  (One of the great offenses of the Christian church world is that so many people seem to think Reformed-type academics have dibs on scholarship.)

Vanhoozer’s name sounds Dutch to me, which leads me to presume he is from a Christian Reformed or Dutch Reformed tradition.  Whether I’m correct on the identification or not, I find the efforts of this group at once admirable and ill-conceived.  Admirable, because even a quick scan reveals that the “Reforming Catholic Confession” goes to some effort to be ecumenical, playing nice in the larger sandox.  It’s even ostensibly scripture-oriented.  But it is also ill-advised:  at its essence, this confession is but one more tarpaulin covering scripture’s spiritual ground. 

Part of me celebrates the idea of the Reformation—a complex of ideas and events, certainly not all attributable to Martin Luther.  On principle, I tend to use process-oriented gerunds such as “reforming” or “restoring” instead of “reformed” or “Reformation,” but even the Protestant Reformation deserves some attention as an event.  The confessions, not so much.  I suspect that, in time (maybe just a couple of years!), history will find this particular “confession” to be little more than another historical curiosity, superimposed on scripture.


3 thoughts on “Again with the reforming

  1. dinoconstant 10/31/2017 / 7:17 pm

    Hi Brian

    I rather liked this post.

    Like you, I feel it’s wrong, possibly arrogant to imagine that we are ‘reformed’ rather than reforming. It was me who suggested on Steven’s website that the title The Last Reformation was presumptuous.

    The process of confessing to a priest is far removed from the original notion of confessing to one another or directly to God. A priest does not have the authority or power to forgive – this is for God to do as part of a healing process, not as a Sunday routine by confessors who repeat the same sins over again. This is only my view and I have no desire to offend but to say what I think is true.

    Peace and love to you and all humanity,


    Liked by 1 person

    • Brian Casey 11/01/2017 / 6:51 am

      Dinos, thanks so much for looking in here. Appears we are kindred spirits here, re: ongoing reformation and such spheres as confession. Maybe we’ll have more dialogue in the future.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. dinoconstant 11/01/2017 / 9:24 am

    Yes, Brian, I think we are kindred spirits and I’ll check some of your other posts on your website later tonight.

    Peace and love to you and to all,


    Liked by 1 person

Please share your thoughts. I read every comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.