This conversation might not be over

My relationship with hymnals has been on the rocks for a while.  We have a long history together—hymnals and I—but we haven’t spent much time together in a decade or more, and I find myself vacillating between (1) last-ditch attempts to save our relationship and (2) acknowledgment that it’s time to move on because of mounting pressures and other factors beyond our control.  Whatever the underlying reasons, there’s only a fading romantic connection.  Hymnals and I do share a solid foundation and important values, but we’ve definitely been growing apart.¹

I have deep historical connections both to hymsongbooks.jpgnals and hymnology.²  Relatives past and present, friends and acquaintances, and many significant others have been associated with the use of these books (and all this adds to the wistful feelings about hymnals).  An explicit accusation was made against my dad in the 1990s, and, although he had served on an advisory council for Great Songs of the Church, Revised (the brown-covered books seen faintly in this picture, over toward the right), no one in my immediate family has ever had financial interests in mass-marketed hymnal production.  Dad had spent many hours reviewing and corresponding about that hymnal, which is one of the two best in its class, and the very best available at the time.  Never was any hymnal elevated to the Bible’s pedestal in my home.  Collections of them were on my parents’ bookshelves, and the hymnals were sporadically used in devotional group singing in the living room and around the dinner table, but the books weren’t worshipped.

I have continued my parents’ practice of owning, displaying, and periodically using hymnals . . . although the frequency, amount, and depth of use have been decreasing.  A couple years ago, I realized that I had no use for 25-or-so single-copy hymnals in my collection.  Not having interest in trying to sell them on eBay or at a yard sale—any profit would surely have been dwarfed by time and expense—I tried to follow the “if you haven’t needed it or used it in 7 years” rule and threw them in a dumpster.  I did experience a slight twinge of conscience and have so far kept another 30 or 40 hymnals:

  • Ten copies of Great Songs of the Church No. 2 that was last regularly used in our home in 2013
  • Eight copies of a previous edition of The Methodist Hymnal (historically the best mainline denomination hymnal with which I was acquainted, and a source for several purposes) and one Presbyterian hymnal
  • Two copies of Praise for the Lord
  • Misc. other CofC hymnals and handful of other single copies such as The Mennonite Hymnal

More hindsight
I’m now considering the growing-apart nature of this “hymnal relationship” from 2016 backward. . . .

We have visited three congregations in our new area.  Two of them have hymnals, and we are considering an ongoing relationship with one of those groups.  Most of our church groups from 2007 until now have owned and used hymnals, to one degree or another.  Two churches from 2003-2007 did not use hymnals at all, and one did.  The last time I was in a congregation that regularly used hymnals was 15 years ago, and that was prior to the ubiquity of PowerPoint (and the Paperless Hymnal) in many church gatherings.  It does seem clear that there is a trend—among the churches we would consider working with, if not churches as a whole.

In 2016, most of the hymnals in the church halls we enter seem to be dusty and musty, but a few groups still pull them out of the racks periodically . . . perhaps because the projector bulb blew out when the machine was turned on Sunday morning.  Or, perhaps an especially (a) thoughtful or (b) backward-thinking³ or (c) committed-to-hymnals leader wants to use a song that’s not electronically available.

It’s a shame when hymnals fall into disuse.  My soul still needs the nourishment that came from the better songs and hymns of my earlier years.  (I don’t intend the preceding statement to speak in any respect to the value of contemporary songs.)  A couple years ago, I was blog-traversing my personal “worship history” and wrote this along the way:

I was starving.

Then my parents reminded me that a family we knew was working with a church on the north side of town — Hixson, to be precise.  During a visit there one Wednesday night, I got tears in my eyes during a devotional time led by Danny Cline.  Forethought was in evidence, and Danny led sensitively — and led a song with some spiritual depth to it.  Sensitivity and depth were not to be taken for granted in the 80s of my life, for more than one reason.

A big part of me does look with longing at the unused richness of some songs in hymnals.  Another part of me reads the handwriting on the wall rather acutely, realizing that hymnals and I—and hymnals and many entire congregations—are going separate ways.

Is the conversation over?  Is there no hope for this relationship?  Maybe not, if we’re only thinking about the physical item called a hymnal.  I do want, though, to find ways to discover and rediscover the good content of hymnals in ways that non-hymnal people will also pursue.

Next:  comments on a few of another blogger’s reasons to value the hymnal

¹ Please take no offense at the allegorical language here.  I mean no disrespect toward God’s thoughts about human marriage.

² I’m much more interested in hymns themselves than hymnology per se.  While I know a few factoids about the history and study of hymns, there’s only so much time in the day, and hymnology is not really one of my life’s pursuits.

³ The use of hymnals is not inherently backward-thinking.  In the use of “backward,” I’m thinking of a few leaders who seem merely to be resisting learning anything new.  Leaders’ song choices are certainly not always based on thought or intent.


6 thoughts on “This conversation might not be over

  1. Jonna Statt 09/14/2016 / 8:42 am

    I don’t often comment on the few blogs I subscribe to, but this one did catch my attention. I guess each person’s unique background colors their thoughts and interpretation on things as standard in many churches as a hymnal. Having grown up in a non-Christian, Catholic home until I was 17, this was my only exposure to any hymnal – albeit a Catholic one. I always associated in my post-Catholic years for quite some time the term “hymns” with what we sang there – slow, plodding, barely audibly mumbled songs accompanied by this booming organ, and an ever-present song-leading lady beating time that no one seemed to heed.
    After becoming Christians and going into Calvary Chapel type churches where nothing but praise and worship songs were sung, I thought that this new-found way of singing was THE only way to worship. Imagine my surprise when coming to Houghton College initially in the early 1980’s and seeing during Chapel services – gasp – hymnals being used, Sad to say, I didn’t bother to sing along much at all, thinking these people just did not “get it”.
    Fast forward to my own family now. We have been in a conservative Mennonite Christian setting for nearly 15 years. They use pretty exclusively a hymnal, along with four part vocal harmony, without instrumental accompaniment. Wow – for the first time, my husband and I began to see what we had been missing all these years; the beautiful harmony of vocal singing, coupled with some often VERY moving words. We were hooked! We really look forward to singing them each week, and learning new hymns we still may have never sung. We have enjoyed a few interesting books we have around the house detailing the often fascinating backgrounds to somewhat common hymns. As a favorite Christian writer/speaker of ours, Dave Hunt, once said – if he had to be stranded on a desert island, allowed only two books, a hymnal would be his companion to his Bible, as there is such good doctrine and edification within the words of so many hymns. Amen:-)

    P.S. My parents still attend Calvary Chapel churches – and even these churches have begun implementing one to two classic hymns each service, along with their praise songs. Seems to me there is room,and need, for both styles without total exclusion of each other.


    • Brian Casey 09/26/2016 / 8:30 pm

      Several of your thoughts resonate here, and all of them informed me. Thank you for them, and I’m sorry I haven’t responded until now. Time was, in my Church of Christ congregation, when people did mostly pay attention to time beating. These days, it’s becoming more rare.

      Having a hymnal nearby is still a value I hold, if I could put it that way. In fact, last night, on my 75-minute drive home after a rehearsal, I sang 3-4 songs to myself. Two of them were among my top 10 true hymns, and I still nearly have them memorized.

      Incidentally, I have a friend who was in a small Calvary Chapel church for a while — until the pastor from the larger church they were “streaming” into a utility building where they met) was in a scandal and the other leader’s wife became divisive in the small group. The singing there was pretty much nil, by the way, when we visited.


  2. Steve 09/14/2016 / 2:21 pm

    Our generation — those of us who have grown up singing in our homes and at church — frequently had various hymnals in our home libraries for family devotionals, small group gatherings/singings, etc. I can’t fathom not having a variety of hymnals in my home. One of the oldest is from my grandfather whose family were Methodists. One of his favorite songs was “Palms of Victory” (also titled “Deliverance will Come”)–which we sang at his funeral.

    Our current church does not use the hymnal–nor is musical notiation supplied with the Powerpoint slides–which drives me nuts. I really wonder what my grandchildren’s assembly experience via singing will be like, considering the trajectory I see via our musical part of our worship in song.

    Your reflections/observations caused a bit of blissful nostalgia when I read today.


    • Brian Casey 09/26/2016 / 8:38 pm

      I did read this the day you wrote it and than you for the thoughts. “Palms of Victory” is not one I’ve heard of, but I do have a collection of 8 or 10 older Methodist Hymnals. Recently have thought of the connection between Joshua (deliverer) and Yeshua (deliverer) in the course of studying — yes, studying! — the genealogy in Matthew. Not sure I’ve let you know this, and not sure whether it would be of interest since you’ve read a lot of my thoughts in the past 2-3 years, and some are very similar, but . . . my book The Christian Assembly is available on Amazon — see the drop-down under “Books and Other Blogs” in the header here. Also, the music section (the middle third) is available separately. Among other things, this deals with trends in contemporary music, lack of notation, good use of hymnal songs, etc. Maybe you know some people in other churches who would benefit. The most progressive Cs of C would likely not be interested, although 1/2 to 2/3 of the book might be applicable.

      My dad is currently considering a way to get some of my thoughts into College CofC. He also has just mentioned overwhelmingly positive impressions of Keith Lancaster, who is leading during HU lectures right now. Thought you might like to know that, if you hadn’t heard it from someone else already.

      I feel nostalgia when I hear or sing a good song from my yesteryear, as you might expect. Anymore, though, the instances of nostalgia seem fewer and further between.


Please share your thoughts. I read every comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.