On Conducting (3) and accounting: conventional practices

I once took an accounting course.  I was working at a bank at the time and thought it would contribute to my interest (and make me appear more interested) in the world of money.¹  I remember that the accounting textbook referred to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles).  At the time, in my late 20s, I don’t recall questioning the notion of general acceptance, but I now imagine that there are all sorts of variations on what’s “generally accepted” as sound procedure in financial accounting.

In conducting, there are also some generally accepted principles—benchmarks or non-negotiables, if you will.  One universally accepted pattern is that the “downbeat” is down; the last beat is up, and the next-to last is out.  However, some very fine, artistic conductors agree that “not all downbeats are down.”  Some music seems to cry that its downbeats are less about “gravity” and should move forward—and even up!—with less weight and more effervescence.  The aim to express the musical essence must trump the generally accepted patterns.

The expression of authentic Christian faith—faith that is truly of Christ—must rise above generally accepted patterns, too.  Who knows, after all, why a pattern became generally accepted?!

Other meditational/pedagogical posts on conducting may be found here.

¹I got an A and enjoyed some of the work at the time, but I can’t imagine registering for such a course these days.


Please share your thoughts. I read every comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.