Struggles of the a cappella kingdom

Let me just start with an arithmetic sum.

+4
-1

-2
+0

-1

—–

You can check my math, and you might find I entered something incorrectly, but at the end of this relatively short post-day, the point will remain.

You see, no other church types deal with this.  (The others have their own problems.)  But they don’t deal with singing songs 4 scalar steps too high or a step too low.  We do.  We do deal with this.  We deal with it because we have many leaders who don’t have the requisite skills and/or tools and/or understanding.

Stop right now, ye criticizers of those who critique.  While you may be justified in personal annoyance at something you’re not interested in, you are not justified in sitting in your own judgment chair, judging this or other critiques as unwarranted simply because they are critiques.  So, cease thou thy dismissive hand-waves.  Cease thinking I shouldst spend my time on something more important (read:  some issue you’re more interested in).  And by all means, cease thinking that this is just a musician talking about something that’s not really of concern to the a cappella church.

This is real stuff.  It deals with physical and acoustical realities (not mere opinions).

The math above?  Have you figured it out?  It represents pitch levels in the songs sung in a recent assembly.  With 0 as the theoretical “ground zero” of pitch, +4 means 4 steps too high; -1 means one step too low, etc.  The net grand average in this particular assembly turned out to be about 1/2 step low, but some of the individual songs’ pitch levels were not OK.  2 or  4 steps low is untenable, in most cases.

The numbers are only estimates; moreover, it captures theoretical points in time per song, in essence averaging the pitch levels that changed throughout the given song.

Is the precise pitch for each song important?  Well, no, not in most cases.  A half-step doesn’t often make too much difference.  But the general pitch level is important, and even one step can have a notable effect on the atmosphere.

Aside:  much of the contemporary repertoire associated with solo “artist” voices is written and sung at pitch levels not conducive to congregational singing.  Leaving other issues aside for the moment, a transcriber/arranger must consider the pitch level of all the voice parts to be singing.  If singing the melody in unison, roughly Bb/C to C/D (an octave above) is generally OK.  But if SATB parts are part of the conception, as in most a cappella churches, the melody generally needs to range a bit higher — from D, up an octave to E/F.  When a melody is too low or too high or too broad in its range, human vocal ranges are strained, and/or harmonies don’t work (remember, we’re talking about acoustical realities and mathematical relationships between frequencies here, not simple tastes in voice quality or harmony.

Although opinion is involved, this is not primarily a matter of preference or opinion.  It is a matter of empirically observable reality.  The human voice operates within God-designed parameters, and harmonies exist within a natural order which is also, of course, God-originated.

A cappella leaders, really . . . this is important.  Get the pitch right (or at least within a half-step), and keep it there.  (Don’t let the pitch plummet or soar with the whims of the loudest, out-of-tune voices in the hall.)

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Struggles of the a cappella kingdom

  1. Anne Boyd 10/14/2013 / 12:10 pm

    This is important to people who like to sing. (It hurts my throat when the pitch is way off.) I’ve been blessed by some outstanding song leaders…such as Gerald Casey, Brian Casey, Dan Boyd, Jack Boyd, Ken Helterbrand, Don Hall, Ryan Christian to name a few. I won’t mention some who have no song leading skills, but lead singing because no one else is willing to. I do praise them for doing their best.

    Like

    • Brian Casey 10/14/2013 / 3:56 pm

      Throats are worth saving — if not for the next life, for greater corporate engagement in this one. 🙂 Thanks for the kind words, and absolutely, kindness and grace should be extended to those who do their best in various settings.

      Taking a bird’s-eye view and thinking of various situations I’ve been aware of in the past, viz. others as well as myself, it behooves leaders such as elders to be aware of the particular talent pools they’re working with. (This doesn’t apply only to song leading, but to any public role such as reading, announcements; electrical work, roofing, etc.) In a church of 50, Brother Q might well be praised for doing his best in whatever roles he fills, but in a church of 200 in which Sister U and Brother V have moved in a year or two ago and have far more gift in a specific area, elders might do well to find Brother Q another area in which to work — for the good of individuals and the whole congregation!

      Like

  2. Matthew William Bassford 10/14/2013 / 11:34 pm

    Comment via Facebook from Matthew William Bassford:

    Good post. I think the most significant point here has to do with transparency of worship. Like that of most Christians, my vocal range is modest. In order for me to sing a given part comfortably, the hymn has to be pretty much on pitch. If it is significantly mis-pitched, I spend the hymn thinking, “I can’t sing this note” instead of being able to focus on the meaning.

    Proper pitch is not some music-nerd hobby horse. It is essential for fulfilling God’s goals for our worship together.

    Like

Please share your thoughts. I read every comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s