Structure of thoughts

Lately I’ve become re-interested in chiastic structure.  If you’re a weird one who likes this kind of ostensibly heady thing, try your hand at picking out the paired relationships in this prayer I composed and led in 2005.  (Which is easier for me to say to thee?  “Rise, energize thy mind, and reason,” or “Sit back, relax, and lettest thou me figure out how to format this so it’s instantly clear?”)

Now, Father, we come.

We come, in the stillness of this time, to do something You asked us to do often.

We come, according to the desire of Jesus, and because we believe He forever opened the door (and left it open!), for us to commune.

We Westview Christians come not to “take communion,” as though it were a thing … a possession being offered and accepted in some sort of material transaction.

We come not even to “communion,” as though it were an event more than a familial union of spirits.

We come to commune with You, YHVH the gracious Father,
and with You, Jesus the Son.

We are needy and ready to experience Your grace …
to share in Your Nature …
to participate
with our whole selves
in the most stupendous of Your provisions:

Jesus, our Emmanuel,
the grace-gift of the Father.

We come to not to an event,

Or to some magical, grace-giving transaction, but to commune with You—
and with all these who call You “Father.”

We come in the name of Jesus.

We come, on this October morning, still now in Your presence, as You desire.

We approach You in spirit, Father God.

Now why would a stupid human go and compose a modern English prayer in chiastic form that emulates some Hebrew and Greek structure?  In no way do I present my prayer as inspired, but I was working with chiasms at the time and enjoyed the mental/spiritual challenge of penning thoughts in that form.  I thought that maybe, just maybe, there could be value in such a structure.  Maybe this form isn’t so specially situated in ancient cultures, after all, and maybe human minds and hearts could lock in to the utterings in a fresh way.

Musicians out there:  ever heard of ABA form or Arch Form?  Sonata form (a/k/a “first-movement form”) is also directly related here.  These are common ways to make musical sense so that people “get it” when they hear it.

Dramatists:  common dramatic forms exist in three or five acts, with the conclusion  tying up loose ends and bring things full circle.  You know, as in Seinfeld episodes.  🙂

Seems to me that this kind of structure of thought is more ubiquitous and useful than I once thought.  That chiasms and sandwich structures or triptychs appear in Mark’s gospel shouldn’t surprise me.

Advertisements

One thought on “Structure of thoughts

Please share your thoughts. I read every comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s